![]() Okay, I watched it because it boasts a wonderfully clean and richly colored 1080p transfer. The first two Bonds at least flirted with realism from time to time, but with Goldfinger the realism was more or less out the window.įor a reason I can’t quite fathom I popped in my Goldfinger Bluray last night and endured the damn thing. Guy Hamilton‘s Goldfinger (’64) was the film that demonstrated how the burgeoning Bond franchise had become drunk on its own fumes and begun to degenerate into foolery. Because they’re the only two Connerys that aren’t undermined by high-tech gadgetry, silly stunts, Daffy Duck-level plotting and an attitude of smug financial arrogance on the part of the producers. ![]() No (’62) and From Russia With Love (’63), both directed by Terence Young. ![]() ![]() For decades I’ve been convinced that there are only two Sean Connery 007 films worth re-watching - Dr. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |